A lot of today's issues are brought up in a way that's adversarial and that isn't really holding logic. Worse, it assumes a LOT based on a small slice of a person. I won't go into all those right now, but I do think sometimes ideas more likely to come to the top are ones that pit groups against each other. Saying someone has a systematic advantage is true. It's not accusatory to say that, and it also leaves room to talk about advantages others have, such as social skills or money, or looks, that's independent of race or tribal affiliation. Saying, when you don't know someone that the reason they've succeeded or have a particular opinion you don't like (without asking why) is because they are White, in part, is the definition of a prejudice. I get this a lot, but I've lost a lot of opportunities and have otherwise been dismissed or marginalized in favor of men and women who have better social skills or are considered more "approproiate" choices because I am an uncommon woman as a Female Aspie and a middle class Jew, part of a powerful minority, but still a minority.